Start with your sources.
Choose the material your team can use, then follow a claim back to the passage behind it.
“Make the first question easy to ask.”Source linked
YOUR AI TEAM. ONE DESKTOP WORKSPACE.
Bring the question, choose the roles and shape the next step together. OptiVerse Studio is building a multi-agent workspace, with meeting and reading tools to carry useful context into the work.
OptiVerse Studio Multi-agent workspace in development See AI team plans
What should we build next?
Compare the evidence. Shape a proposal. You choose the next step.
THE TEAM IN ACTION
Follow a concept of how your team could research, discuss and refine a proposal—with you in control.
I want to build a research tool. Compare possible directions and prepare a proposal for me to consider.
Interview transcript · v1Research tool concept.pdfStart with researchers to test reading and source-work needs.
Transcript 12:04Begin with one source import, then guide the first question.
Read Customer interviews, outside the allowed scope
Allow onceDenyThe proposal is missing first-use steps. Theo, please add them.
Proposal v1Start with researchers and simplify the first import and question.
Accept this versionRequest changesCurrent features & future plans
Explore the planned AI team workspace, results and work management, alongside reading tools implemented in the development build. Each feature carries its own status.
Discuss ideas with different roles, adjust the members and decide how to continue—from exploration to a plan and shared work.
Ask members directly, follow up and add your own ideas. Add members or adjust roles and skills as needed, with their conversations and status visible.
Planned connections include Codex with a ChatGPT subscription and Claude Code. Accounts, quotas and billing follow provider rules. Material given to these cloud AI services is sent to the provider; integration support still needs validation.
Inspect the note, brief or file version a member cites, and distinguish supported claims from judgments that need checking. Sources that could not be read are identified.
Authorized work can continue. Decisions and requests for additional permission appear in “Needs me,” where you can inspect the scope, allow once, deny or add instructions.
See whether work is still running separately from the version of its result. Pause or request a stop when needed; a stop remains marked as requested until confirmation arrives.
Open a document, compare its Traditional Chinese translation with the original, keep useful passages and ask questions with source links. These tools are implemented in the development build; AI team integration remains planned.
Import PDF, Word (.docx), Markdown and text files for reading and source-based questions.
Files are stored on your device. Scanned PDFs without a text layer can be viewed and used with manual notes; translation, extraction and questions require readable text.
Switch between Original, Translation and Side by side to check wording as you read.
Translation currently targets Traditional Chinese and uses the built-in local model. Completed passages are saved, so you can stop and continue translating later.
Translate this page or the whole document. PDF translation uses the original page’s text areas to keep its layout recognizable.
Layout preservation applies to PDFs. Dense translated text may shrink or be clipped, with a warning. Word, Markdown and text use a flowing bilingual view rather than preserving the original pagination.
Highlight a passage or quote it into notes with a link back to the source. Inspect citations in document answers.
The reader can follow recognized numbered references such as [1] and existing PDF links. Answer citations help you inspect source passages; you still need to check whether a claim is supported.
Generate study notes with source links, or use Ask for This document or All documents.
Study notes use the built-in local model. Ask uses the selected provider; choosing a remote service sends the question and relevant excerpts to it. Each question uses the chosen documents, without conversation memory.
EPUB import remains planned. The current reader accepts PDF, Word (.docx), Markdown and text files.
Apply a shared glossary across reading, summaries and translation to reduce variations in names and technical terms.
Combine selected documents and discussion records in one question, with page or time references where available. Current document Ask and meeting Ask remain separate.
See who contributed and which sources were used. Request changes, revisit retained drafts and choose the version to accept.
Results name their author, version and the source versions used, so you can check the basis for the work.
Give feedback on the current version or choose to accept it. Continue refining new drafts as needed.
Give feedback on the version you are viewing or explicitly accept it. A later version needs its own acceptance rather than inheriting your earlier decision.
Open a retained earlier version without changing it. Continuing from it creates a new draft and preserves the earlier content.
Save accepted work to your chosen folder and check that it arrived successfully.
Save an accepted result to the chosen folder and track whether delivery succeeded. A failed save does not remove the accepted version or its acceptance record.
Review recent work, inspect the information kept for later and decide whether it should still be used.
Gather included meetings, reading and tasks into a short recap of recent developments and work that remains open.
Open stored information about projects, people and topics, inspect its sources and decide whether it is still useful for future work.
Edit stored information or stop its future use within a chosen scope. Deletion is a separate action with its own supported scope; it does not mean deleting the original sources.
Trace a topic through the meetings, papers and notes you have included, in time order, to see how the discussion developed or changed.
Compare original and translated transcripts, check important terms and prepare subtitles for later review. Live translated captions remain a separate planned capability.
Translate transcripts and summaries, preserving available transcript timestamps for checking against the recording.
Read the content in your preferred language, with available timestamps preserved in transcripts. Content already in that language is not translated again; Simplified-to-Traditional Chinese conversion runs on the device without a separate translation.
Compare the original and translation line by line to check uncertain wording, or switch to a single-language view.
Export SRT or WebVTT subtitles, with both languages when needed.
Export SRT or WebVTT subtitles using the transcript’s timing and complete-sentence segments. Choose bilingual subtitles when needed, with the language identified in the file name.
Keep names, acronyms and product terms in a glossary for transcription, summaries and translation. Import a CSV or review names suggested from your discussions.
List unwanted terms with preferred alternatives and a reason. Occurrences in summaries or translations are flagged for review rather than silently rewritten.
Check language, missing lines, glossary terms and unwanted wording, with inconsistent translations grouped together. Lines that fail a check retain the original text and can be translated again individually.
Use find and replace in a transcript, saving a new version that stays linked to the recording. Confirmed names can also join the vocabulary for future recordings.
Supported computers can show a quick translation grouped into sentences while recording. A second translation uses the complete discussion afterward, so live wording may change.
Bring related sources and open work together so you can find earlier decisions and see what still needs attention.
Add related meetings, notes and tasks to a project, then review its decisions, open commitments and unanswered questions in one place.
Trace a task back to its source and see whether its owner and due date were stated or inferred.
Follow a task back to the content that raised it, and see whether its owner and due date were stated or inferred. Regenerating a summary preserves completed-task status.
See separate flags for possibly outdated information, missing support and conflicting claims, alongside their evidence. Choose what to keep, correct, dismiss or replace without rewriting the originals.
Open related meetings, decisions or tasks and see why they are connected. Incomplete source coverage is identified.
Confirm the task, owner and due date before placing it on your calendar as you choose, keeping a link to the original discussion.
Choose the material a task can use, inspect reported progress and usage, and handle decisions or additional permissions in one place.
Select meetings, notes and tasks and check the scope before asking. Answers cite the passages actually used and identify unreadable material or insufficient evidence.
Look back over sources, processing location, progress and results. Unreported information stays unknown.
Inspect available records of purpose, sources, processing location, progress, results and usage. Unreported details stay unknown, and cancelled or retried work is checked before a result is treated as current.
Connections to Codex with a ChatGPT subscription or Claude Code are intended to show the account, billing mode and data destination. Cloud processing sends relevant material to the provider; support depends on integration testing and provider rules.
Check available usage and remaining account allowance, with the source and update time.
See token processing rate, recorded usage, context in use and remaining account allowance as separate readings, with a source and time. Unreported values stay unknown; other work on the account may affect its remaining allowance.
Keep a well-defined, repeatable task with its required material, expected result and limits. Preview what it would produce or change before deciding to use it.
Preferences you write or accept show their scope, source and last confirmation. Disable or remove them to change how later work uses them.
Run saved workflows and exports from a terminal or script, using the application’s limits and the same activity log to inspect the result.
Collect recordings, documents and excerpts with their origins, then select what to use for a question or share with the team.
Store recordings, papers, Word files, e-books and Markdown on your device and search content that has been imported and indexed. Adding it to the library does not automatically grant the team access.
Collect links, excerpts and files with their origins, then choose what to use in a project or question.
Keep links, excerpts and files with their origins in a reference inbox, then select them for a project or question. Capturing a page does not crawl the pages it links to.
Import supported meeting transcripts, SRT or WebVTT files with available timestamps, ready to use for summaries, translation and questions.
Save an article or page excerpt to the inbox with its original source, then choose what to bring into your work later.
Before adding a Markdown folder, review the proposed import and resolve conflicts. Importing leaves the original files unchanged.
See storage use, attachment references and broken links without automatic deletion. Compare a retained note version before restoring it.
These are interface schematics. Reading features exist in the development build; other experiences are planned as labeled. Public release still requires validation. External AI services receive relevant material when selected.
WORK AS A TEAM
A planned workspace for researching, designing and reviewing together. Give the team a question, follow the discussion and choose the next step.
Illustrative interaction concepts · in development
Choose the material your team can use, then follow a claim back to the passage behind it.
“Make the first question easy to ask.”Source linked
Bring research, design and review into the same discussion, with roles you can adjust as the work develops.
Let the team question a draft, propose improvements and carry your feedback into the next version.
Review the proposal, ask for changes or accept a version when it meets your needs.
Keep refining, or choose the version to continue with.
A ROLE FOR EVERY QUESTION
Start with the work you want to move forward. Explore how a research partner, designer or reviewer could help you think it through.
Compare findings, follow citations and ask where the evidence is still thin.
Explore more use casesTurn selected research and interview notes into a proposal you can question and refine.
Explore more use casesCheck a draft against the brief and find what needs a closer look.
Explore more use casesRevisit a recorded discussion, check decisions against the transcript and keep unresolved questions visible.
Explore more use casesFictional examples of planned interactions · in development
ONE DIRECTION. COORDINATED WORK.
The planned experience connects two loops: you and a coordinator keep the direction clear, while specialists work on focused tasks, check results and revise. Their work returns as one result you can inspect.
Illustrative coordination concept · In development. Roles and integrations may change.Use the selected interviews and research brief. Ask before expanding access or changing the scope.
INNER LOOP · FOCUSED EXECUTION
The coordinator brings together the goal, selected context, ownership and what a useful result must show.
Find which part of getting started caused trouble in the interviews.
↳ Evidence notes + source passagesTask definedDraft a guided first question within the agreed scope.
↳ A first-step proposalTask definedCheck the proposal against the brief, sources and open questions.
↳ Findings + revision requestsReview criteria setA check can send work back. Clarify missing context before starting dependent work.
The same goal, with clear responsibilities, limits and checks.
Research and design can progress separately. Each specialist keeps its own work visible; dependent checks wait for the material they need.
Find which part of getting started caused trouble in the interviews.
↳ Evidence notes + source passagesReading selected sourcesDraft a guided first question within the agreed scope.
↳ A first-step proposalDrafting the approachCheck the proposal against the brief, sources and open questions.
↳ Findings + revision requestsWaiting for the draftA check can send work back. Only independent tasks run in parallel; dependencies remain visible.
The coordinator brings the separate findings back to the same brief.
The reviewer finds that the draft assumes more interviews than the selected sources support. The coordinator sends that part back for revision.
Find which part of getting started caused trouble in the interviews.
↳ Evidence notes + source passagesSource passages readyDraft a guided first question within the agreed scope.
↳ A first-step proposalRevision requestedCheck the proposal against the brief, sources and open questions.
↳ Findings + revision requestsGap identifiedA check can send work back. Keep the failed check and the next revision connected.
The recommendation narrows; the uncertainty stays in the result instead of disappearing.
The coordinator combines the revised proposal, source passages, checks and open questions into one result for you to review.
Find which part of getting started caused trouble in the interviews.
↳ Evidence notes + source passagesEvidence linkedDraft a guided first question within the agreed scope.
↳ A first-step proposalRevision includedCheck the proposal against the brief, sources and open questions.
↳ Findings + revision requestsChecks recordedA check can send work back. Passing checks and unresolved questions are reported separately.
A guided opening question, the interview evidence behind it, and a next step to test with new users.
Back to your direction. Inspect the sources, request changes or choose the next step. A finished task does not make the decision for you.
See the team plansBring useful context into the work
Capture what was said and understand what you read. These development tools help you keep the evidence close as multi-agent collaboration takes shape.
Capture audio, review the transcript and summary, and ask about the meeting with links back to the source.
Read alongside a Traditional Chinese translation, keep notes and ask questions with source links. PDF translation can follow the original page layout.
THE WORK, CONNECTED
A planned workspace where your sources, your AI team and the next version of an idea stay part of the same conversation.
Illustrative AI team workflow · in development01Keep the source close
Bring a question and the material behind it into the discussion. The planned team experience keeps the relevant passage close to the idea it supports, so you can see where a recommendation comes from.
Explore research use casesEarly interviews about starting a new research project.
“I have the notes. I just don’t know what to ask first.”
Interview 02 · selected passage
A useful first question may matter more than adding another import option.
↗ Interview notes · 0202Think across perspectives
A research partner follows the evidence. A designer explores an approach. A reviewer looks for gaps. Adjust the planned roles around the work and add your own judgment as the discussion develops.
Explore the roles in practiceThe interviews point to the first question as the main obstacle.
What if the first screen offered a useful starting question?
Test that direction with new users before widening the scope.
03Make the next version better
Ask for a clearer argument, question an assumption or take another direction. The planned workflow brings the discussion back to a revised proposal, with you choosing the version to continue with.
See the AI team plans“Make the first step clearer. Keep the evidence and the open question.”
Start by importing a source.
Start with a guided question.
Request another change, or choose this direction.
Questions
Understand the product, availability and data handling. Find detailed guidance in the docs.
OptiVerse Studio is an AI team desktop workspace in development. Discuss directly with different roles, adjust members and skills, and work from exploration through design and execution. Existing recording, transcript and summary capabilities will join that workflow in stages.
OptiVerse Studio does not have a public installer yet. For the separate enterprise product, use the AI Tools business order application to order 語音轉錄既資訊知識整合平台. Enter and review your company and contact details, then submit. 富宇資訊科技有限公司 (OptiVerse Technology Ltd.) sends the order confirmation and provides the licensed software download and License Key. AI Tools business order application
Studio defaults to local recording, transcription and built-in-model summaries. Selecting external AI sends relevant material to that service. The OptiVerse Studio AI team also plans to use external services; destinations depend on the features and services selected. Deleting local content does not remove exports, backups or material already sent to external services.
Tell us about your work, or ask about OptiVerse Studio development.